Cases 41 - 50 of 363
Anderson v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv02417
Plaintiff:
Antonio Anderson
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, United States Marshal Service, Bennett Echols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Shelby County Correctional Center et al
as 2:2022cv02351
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamonte Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby County Correctional Center, Kirk Fields, Correctional Deputy Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01077
Plaintiff:
Omari Moore
Defendant:
Jeff Smith and Jackie Bausman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowles v. Tennessee Department of Correctional - CCA et al
as 3:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Mario Bowles
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correctional - CCA, Warden f/n/u Frink, Assistant Warden J. Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sarten v. Bradshaw et al
as 3:2021cv00399
Plaintiff:
Avery Sarten
Defendant:
Buddy Bradshaw, Henry J Cullen, Julia C Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv02725
Plaintiff:
Unique Brooks
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Kenneth Southerland, D. Cherry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. USA
as 3:2021cv00342
Petitioner:
Jimmy McLain Moore
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2021cv02547
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Daugherty et al
as 3:2021cv00644
Plaintiff:
George Mason
Defendant:
Stephen Daugherty, Shane George, (f/n/u) Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. Booth et al
as 1:2021cv00166
Plaintiff:
Donyell DeWayne Holland
Defendant:
Officer Booth and Officer Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
