Cases 41 - 50 of 104
COIT v. SORBER et al
as 2:2021cv01568
Defendant:
JAIME SORBER, OLIVERI, GILLARDS and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIGUEROA et al v. STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION - PHOENIX et al
as 2:2021cv00384
Defendant:
JAIME SORBER, FIRST NAME UNCLEAR; WITH THE INITIAL "B", LAST NAME "HUNER", STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION - PHOENIX and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN FIGUEROA and ANY AND ALL INMATES' CONFINED WITHIN SCI-PHOENIX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2020cv00369
Petitioner:
LQ5286 JAMES JOSEPH OWENS and JAMES JOSEPH OWENS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COOPER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv04595
Defendant:
COUNSELOR WENTZEL, K. OWENS, MELISSA DELLIPONTE and others
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN COOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BREWER v. SMITH et al
as 2:2020cv01203
Plaintiff:
DONTE BREWER
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, -. OWENS, B. J. SALAMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Talbert v. Pennsylvania State Correctional Officer Association et al
as 3:2020cv01154
Defendant:
Jaime Sorber, Lt K Young, Laural Harry and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Talbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. BOGAN et al
as 2:2020cv01115
Defendant:
SUSAN KEESLER, JAMES SCHUCK, KATE MCDERMOTT and others
Plaintiff:
DOREL JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. RUSSELL et al
as 5:2019cv06014
Defendant:
AMANDA MEAD, DOUGLAS METTE, IDA GARDNER and others
Plaintiff:
KAMEL KEVIN JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAYNARD v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv05459
Defendant:
JERRY ANKROM, GENA CLARK, MICHAEL BURTON and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY BAYNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Mahally et al
as 1:2019cv01468
Defendant:
Lawrence P Mahally, George Miller, Dipti Amin and others
Plaintiff:
Daysean M. Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
