Cases 41 - 50 of 206
Peters v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 3:2022cv02163
Plaintiff:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Ken Paxton and Greg Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weinert v. Paxton et al
as 5:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Steven Weinert and Steven Alexander Weinert
Defendant:
John B. Scott, Sheriff Chris White, Sheriff Kelly Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Rosenthal et al
as 4:2022cv02659
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Lee H Rosenthal, District Judge Keith P Ellison, US District Judge Lynn N Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiley v. Paxton et al
as 5:2022cv00189
Petitioner:
Anthony Bernard Wiley
Respondent:
Ken Paxton and Marsha McClane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wiley v. Paxton et al
as 7:2022cv00065
Petitioner:
Anthony Bernard Wiley
Respondent:
Ken Paxton and Marsha McClane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Desmarais v. Paxton et al
as 1:2022cv00661
Plaintiff:
John Desmarais
Defendant:
Jr. Kenneth Paxton, Kelly Nance Harrell and Kenneth W. Paxton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Paxton
as 6:2022cv00247
Defendant:
Jeremy Ramone Bailey
Respondent:
Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Warden et al
as 3:2022cv01306
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Warden, NFN Wonders, NFN Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Paxton
as 5:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Quincy Nelson
Defendant:
Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kemp v. Paxton
as 4:2022cv01045
Plaintiff:
John Edward Kemp
Defendant:
TX Attorney General Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
