Cases 41 - 50 of 57
GREEN v. PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PRISON MENTAL HEALTH, MENTAL UNIT et al
as 2:2010cv00212
Plaintiff:
MUWSA GREEN
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PRISON MENTAL HEALTH, MENTAL UNIT, BUFFER, J. BALTIMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERSON v. UNIONTOWN POLICE DEPT. et al
as 3:2009cv00150
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND E. PETERSON
Defendant:
UNIONTOWN POLICE DEPT. and FAYETTE COUNTY DRUG TASK FORCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ball v. Lamas et al
as 1:2009cv00846
Plaintiff:
Dawn Ball
Defendant:
Lamas, Wright, Lt. Noonan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ball v. Oden et al
as 1:2009cv00847
Plaintiff:
Dawn Ball
Defendant:
Oden, Reed, Pinard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ball v. Hill et al
as 1:2009cv00773
Plaintiff:
Dawn Ball
Defendant:
Hill, Robenolt, Lamas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUHAMMAD v. ROZUM et al
as 2:2009cv00942
Plaintiff:
CARL MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
GERALD L. ROZUM, DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, PETERSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PETERSON v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2008cv05947
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. PETERSON
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., SPRAGUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DICKSON v. SCI GREENSBURG et al
as 2:2008cv01102
Plaintiff:
CHAD B. DICKSON
Defendant:
SCI GREENSBURG, NELSON, PETERSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Peterson v. Karestes et al
as 3:2008cv01159
Petitioner:
Robert Peterson
Respondent:
John Karestes and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Peterson v. Holt et al
as 1:2007cv02280
Petitioner:
Thomas Peterson
Respondent:
Ronnie R. Holt and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
