Cases 41 - 50 of 204
Jorge Solano-Moreta v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 17-1019
Petitioner - Appellant:
JORGE J. SOLANO-MORETA
Respondent - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and ROBERT NAPEL, Warden
Franklin Clayton v. MDOC, et al
as 17-1003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN DAVID CLAYTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT NAPEL, Warden, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON and others
Calvin Marshall v. Robert Napel
as 16-2723
Petitioner - Appellant:
CALVIN E. MARSHALL
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT NAPEL, Warden
Marvin Belser v. Brenda James, et al
as 16-2578
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN BELSER
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENDA JAMES, Health Care Unit Manager, JOHN AUSTIN, D.O. (originally named as James Austin on docket in error), ANGELA ROSE, Nurse Practitioner and others
Defendant:
ERICA HUSS, Deputy Warden and K. GIESEN, ARUS
Lorenzo Johnson v. Robert Napel
as 16-2566
Petitioner - Appellant:
LORENZO JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT NAPEL, Warden
Allen #570060 v. Alexsander et al
as 2:2016cv00245
Plaintiff:
Damon Sean Allen #570060
Defendant:
James Alexsander, Unknown Govern, Connie Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ives #792595 v. Napel
as 2:2016cv00243
Petitioner:
Kevin Michael Ives #792595
Respondent:
Robert Napel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Theriot #423068 v. Woods et al
as 2:2016cv00234
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dwayne Theriot #423068
Defendant:
Jeffrey Woods, Unknown Thompson, Unknown Libby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom #228931 v. Napel et al
as 2:2016cv00233
Plaintiff:
Anthoine Deshaw Odom #228931
Defendant:
Robert Napel, Erica Huss, James Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams #221217 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00221
Plaintiff:
Kevin Williams #221217
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Keefe Commissary Network Sales, Shane Place and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
