Cases 41 - 50 of 388
Coaxum v. Grant et al
as 5:2022cv02164
Plaintiff:
Devin Jerell Coaxum
Defendant:
Quandara Grant, Latasha Robinson and Beaufort County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Robinson v. USA
as 2:2022cv02047
Petitioner:
Damien Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Robinson v. State of South Carolina
as 6:2022cv01927
Petitioner:
Otis Maurice Robinson
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Vanderford et al
as 0:2022cv01606
Plaintiff:
Derek Robinson
Defendant:
Nick Vanderford, David Bland, Daniel Bolin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Dunbar v. Warden Robinson
as 9:2022cv00783
Petitioner:
Rusty Merritte Dunbar and Rusty Merritte Dunbar,
Respondent:
Warden Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sullivan v. Kendell et al
as 5:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Perry Sullivan
Defendant:
Brian Kendell, Albert Mack, Travis Guess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Goss v. Robinson
as 2:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Darrell L Goss
Defendant:
Kanzora Robinson and Maria Leggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fishbourne v. Williams et al
as 8:2021cv02964
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Fishbourne
Defendant:
Warden Williams, Warden Robinson, South Carolina Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tutt v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2021cv02220
Plaintiff:
Joey Tutt
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Charles Williams, Jr, Thomas Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Stephens
as 2:2021cv02202
Plaintiff:
Steven Sakaski Robinson
Defendant:
Randerson I. Stephens, Jr., John Prevatte, Barry Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
