Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Abdul Ideen v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 09-2129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUL IDEEN
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD and RANDALL E. BRITTON
WASHINGTON v. BRITTON et al
as 2:2009cv01750
Petitioner:
JASPER WASHINGTON
Respondent:
RANDALL E. BRITTON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILA. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leonard v. McVey et al
as 1:2009cv00666
Plaintiff:
Michael Leonard
Defendant:
Catherine C. McVey, Michael L. Green, Jeffrey R. Imboden and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Angelo Cortez, Jr. v. Randall Britton, et al
as 09-1941
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELO CORTEZ, JR., AKA Israel Polanco, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL E. BRITTON, DA BERKS and ATTY GEN PA
Bricker v. Harlow et al
as 1:2009cv00582
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Bricker
Defendant:
Michael W. Harlow, Fred J. Ruffo, William Ayers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SHELLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT RANDALL E. BRITTON et al
as 3:2009cv00080
Petitioner:
BARRY E. SHELLEY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT RANDALL E. BRITTON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SOMERSET and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TOMLIN v. BRITTON et al
as 2:2009cv00848
Petitioner:
SHAWN TOMLIN
Respondent:
RANDALL E. BRITTON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arnold Carver v. Randall Britton, et al
as 09-1284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARNOLD SEBASTION CARVER
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL E. BRITTON, ATTY GEN PA and STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR.
RODRIGUEZ v. BRITTON
as 2:2009cv00443
Petitioner:
LUIS ANDRES RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
RANDALL E. BRITTON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FOBBS v. BEARD et al
as 3:2008cv00274
Petitioner:
KEITH FOBBS
Respondent:
JEFFREY A. BEARD and RANDALL E. BRITTON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
