Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Chris Leonard v. Robert Henderson
as 11-60192
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRIS J LEONARD
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT HENDERSON
Bridget v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2011cv00424
Plaintiff:
Allen Bridget, Sr
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Robert Henderson and John Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2011cv80243
Plaintiff:
Robert Henderson
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Townzen v. Henderson et al
as 3:2011cv00117
Defendant:
Delanie Burgess, Robert Henderson and Gene Wilson
Plaintiff:
Patrick Townzen, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townzen v. Henderson et al
as 2:2011cv00350
Plaintiff:
Patrick Townzen, Sr
Defendant:
Robert Henderson, Gene Wilson and Delanie Burgess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calvert v. Henderson et al
as 2:2011cv00288
Plaintiff:
Mikell Calvert
Defendant:
Robert Henderson
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Jacobson v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 11-30098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID JACOBSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M LEBLANC, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS, LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS, Municipal Entity, HOWARD PRINCE and others
Terry v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2011cv00112
Plaintiff:
Pat Terry
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Lynn Cooper, John Doe Vajnar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Henderson et al
as 2:2010cv01704
Plaintiff:
Randy L Thomas
Defendant:
Robert Henderson and Dept of Public Safety & Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas v. Louisiana Department of Probation and Parole
as 2:2010cv01583
Plaintiff:
Randy L Thomas
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Probation and Parole, LA Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, Templeton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
