Cases 41 - 50 of 102
Lee v. Rock Island County Jail et al
as 4:2018cv04234
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and Rock Island County Jail
Plaintiff:
Vernon Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fredrickson v. Darrow et al
as 4:2018cv04232
Defendant:
Rock Island Division Courthouse, United States Marshals Service, Kevin Knight and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Brandon Fredrickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bohlander v. Rock Island County Jail et al
as 4:2018cv04220
Defendant:
City of Rock Island, John Doe, 2, John Doe, 3 and others
Plaintiff:
James E Bohlander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villalobos v. Boyd et al
as 1:2018cv07170
Defendant:
Unknown SIS Officer, Two Unknown Correctional Officers, Rock Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Villalobos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whittinghill v. Rock Island County Jail et al
as 4:2018cv04200
Plaintiff:
Charles E Whittinghill, Jr
Defendant:
Rock Island County Jail and Brett Joessy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colvin v. Sully et al
as 4:2018cv04181
Defendant:
Staff Employees, Rock Island County Jail, Police Kelly Blackmens and others
Plaintiff:
Branden Colvin, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gustafson v. Warden of Rock Island County Jail
as 4:2018cv04077
Petitioner:
Daniel A Gustafson
Respondent:
Warden of Rock Island County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. Carr et al
as 4:2018cv04018
Plaintiff:
James Clark
Defendant:
Steve Carr, Lori Cole, Rock Island County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wise v. Armark Company et al
as 4:2018cv04012
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Alfred Wise, Jr.
Defendant:
Armark Company and Armark Employees at Rock Island County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pippins v. Rock Island County et al
as 4:2018cv04010
Plaintiff:
Johnny Pippins
Defendant:
Rock Island County, Illinois Department of Corrections and Illinois State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
