Cases 41 - 50 of 300
Dill et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Teresa Denise Dill, Tarrah Layne Woods, Shannon Michelle Longman and others
Defendant:
FNU Thomas, FNU Hansen, FNU Shumack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith-Shuman v. Pittsburg County
as 6:2023cv00321
Petitioner:
Alice M. Smith-Shuman
Respondent:
Pittsburg County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodroff v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Woodroff
Defendant:
Shannon Smith, Adam Good, Steve Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cole v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Cole
Defendant:
Shannon Smith and Amanda Windell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hope v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Kyle Hope
Defendant:
Shannon Smith and Amanda Windell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brauning v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wayne Brauning
Defendant:
Shannon Smith and Amanda Windell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brauning v. Smith
as 6:2023cv00224
Petitioner:
Jacob Wayne Brauning
Respondent:
Shannon Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brauning v. Brooks et al
as 5:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wayne Brauning
Defendant:
Michael Brooks, Jared Strand, Shannon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prestel v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dean Prestel
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, County of Mcintosh, Kevin Ledbetter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hope v. Smith
as 6:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Hope
Defendant:
Shannon Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
