Cases 41 - 50 of 167
Suber v. Snohomish County Corrections Legal Mail
as 2:2018cv00561
Plaintiff:
James Suber
Defendant:
Snohomish County Corrections Legal Mail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suber v. Snohomish County Jail Mental Health Services et al
as 2:2018cv00484
Plaintiff:
James Suber
Defendant:
Snohomish County Jail Mental Health Services, Sytez, Shrooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suber v. Snohomish County Corrections Bureau Food Services et al
as 2:2018cv00429
Plaintiff:
James Maurice Suber
Defendant:
Snohomish County Corrections Bureau Food Services, Classification, Chaplain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suber v. Snohomish County Corrections Mailroom Staff et al
as 2:2018cv00428
Plaintiff:
James Suber
Defendant:
Snohomish County Corrections Mailroom Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Godwin v. Andrews et al
as 2:2018cv00431
Plaintiff:
Shawn Lee Godwin
Defendant:
Stuart Andrews , Debbie Bellinger , Alta Langdon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borgeson v. Snohomish County Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv00354
Plaintiff:
Colt Borgeson
Defendant:
Snohomish County Corrections, D. Bellinger, Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Snohomish County Corrections Facility et al
as 2:2018cv00182
Plaintiff:
Travis Clinton Coleman
Defendant:
Snohomish County Corrections Facility and Two Transport Guards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Snohomish County Sheriff et al
as 2:2018cv00159
Plaintiff:
Travis Coleman
Defendant:
Snohomish County Sheriff and Christopher Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Snohomish County Corrections
as 2:2018cv00158
Plaintiff:
Travis Clinton Coleman
Defendant:
Snohomish County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. RN Bellinger et al
as 2:2018cv00151
Plaintiff:
Travis Coleman
Defendant:
Bellinger , Andrews and Snohomish County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
