Cases 41 - 50 of 119
Wright v. Spray et al
as 6:2021cv02021
Respondent:
United States Marshal and Adam Spray
Petitioner:
David Quinndale Wright, Jr. and David Quinndale Wright, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tyson v. Anamosa State Prison Business Office
as 1:2021cv00025
Plaintiff:
James Charles Tyson, Sr
Defendant:
Anamosa State Prison Business Office, Lisa, Nikki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2020cv00401
Defendant:
Kim Reynolds, Linda Koechle, Beth Skinner and others
Plaintiff:
Spencer Pierce, Sr.
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laurle Sr v. Black Hawk County Sheriff's Office
as 6:2020cv02106
Plaintiff:
George Laurle Sr
Defendant:
Black Hawk County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart et al v. Henry County Jail et al
as 4:2020cv00383
Defendant:
O. Brown, C. Davis, Henry County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Stewart, Allen Julian Fields, Jr., Nicholas Swank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyson v. Rose
as 4:2020cv00355
Plaintiff:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant:
Stephanie Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of Iowa
as 4:2020cv00350
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Petitioner:
Antonio D. Williams, Sr.
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Von Reeden, Sr. v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00289
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
John Carl Von Reeden, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Ankeny Police Officers
as 4:2020cv00283
Defendant:
Polk County, Polk County Courthouse, Police Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Williams, Sr. and Antonio D. Williams, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lumpkins v. Muenster et al
as 2:2020cv01035
Plaintiff:
Blanch Lumpkins, Sr
Defendant:
Michael Muenster, Dubuque County Jail, Mary Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
