Cases 41 - 50 of 199
Davalloo v. Kaplan
as 22-1646
Petitioner / Appellant:
Sheila Davalloo
Respondent / Appellee:
Sabina Kaplan, Superintendent, Bedford Hills Correctional Facility and George Jepsen, Attorney General of the State of Connecticut
Amancio v. Deperry et al
as 3:2022cv00918
Plaintiff:
Sirley Amancio
Defendant:
Jeffery Deperry and Town of Old Saybrook
Intervenor:
Attorney General of the State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Carolina v. Connecticut
as 22-1550
Petitioner / Appellant:
Tyrone Douglas Carolina
Respondent / Appellee:
State of Connecticut and Commissioner
Lopez v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv00565
Petitioner:
Ramon Lopez
Respondent:
Angel Quiros and State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kinnel v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv00538
Plaintiff:
Marquis Kinnel
Defendant:
State of Connecticut and Gerald Valletta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. State of Connecticut et al
as 1:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Granville S. Watson
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Manchester Police Department and Manchester Probation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conquistador v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Jean Karlo Conquistador
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, Ned McCormick, D. Lang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baltas v. Dones et al
as 3:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Joe Baltas
Defendant:
Alexandro Dones, Gervacio Negron, Yavuz Usluca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Martin et al
as 3:2021cv01465
Petitioner:
Andrew Cook
Respondent:
Martin and State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kaminski v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2021cv01347
Plaintiff:
John S. Kaminski
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Corrections, UConn Health Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
