Cases 41 - 50 of 80
ALI v. DUPONT et al
as 2:2018cv00665
Plaintiff:
MUSTAFA ALI
Defendant:
JOSEPH H. DUPONT, MICHAEL OVERMYER, DERRICK OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHEELER v. DEBOVOW et al
as 2:2018cv01278
Defendant:
H. D.E.B. DEBUVOW, ELEBY, PUTMAN and others
Plaintiff:
AARON CHRISTOPHER WHEELER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2018cv00086
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, PAUL NOEL, JOSEPH SILVA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2018cv00361
Plaintiff:
William D. Turner
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Correction Care Solution , Carl Keldie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KLOSS v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ANTHONY KLOSS
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC, JACKIE HESTER, MARCY DUDDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddowes v. Director of State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00125
Plaintiff:
Shane Eddowes
Defendant:
Director of State Department of Corrections, Mark Gorman , Morris Houser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAVIS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2017cv01293
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DAVIS
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, PAUL NOEL, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAGAN v. KORSZNIAK et al
as 2:2017cv03988
Plaintiff:
ALBERT PAGAN
Defendant:
JOSEPH KORSZNIAK, STEPHEN WEINER, JOSEPH J. SILVA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CATERBONE v. TRUMP et al
as 5:2017cv04000
Petitioner:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Respondent:
DONALD TRUMP, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECT AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dorsey v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2017cv01261
Plaintiff:
Joseph Marshall Dorsey, IV
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Paul Noel, Bureau of Health Care Services, Assistant Medical Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
