Cases 41 - 50 of 191
Spikes v. Crain et al
as 2:2022cv00742
Plaintiff:
Jason J Spikes and Jason Jarrell Hughes
Defendant:
Johnny D. Crain, Jr. and Tammy Spears
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Spikes v. Harris
as 2:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
James J. Spikes
Defendant:
Brian Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Spikes v. Burns
as 2:2022cv00665
Plaintiff:
Jason J Spikes and Jason Jarrell Hughes
Respondent:
William Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Spikes v. Looney et al
as 2:2022cv00664
Plaintiff:
Jason J Spikes
Defendant:
James H Looney and Prentice L White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Spikes v. Linder
as 2:2022cv00587
Plaintiff:
Jason J Spikes
Defendant:
John Linder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
LaCroix v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00193
Defendant:
DeAngelo Dove, Christopher Erwing, Brandon French and others
Plaintiff:
Terry LaCroix and Terry Lynn LaCroix
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spikes v. Seals
as 2:2022cv00588
Plaintiff:
Jason J Spikes
Defendant:
Randy Seals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Spikes v. Crain et al
as 2:2022cv00589
Plaintiff:
Jason J Spikes
Defendant:
Johnny D. Crain, Jr. and Tammy Spears
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Andrews v. Johnson
as 22-481
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carl Andrews
Defendant / Appellee:
James Johnson, Daniel H. Wolf, Kevin Keating and others
Andrews v. Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv08310
Plaintiff:
Carl Andrews
Defendant:
James Johnson, Daniel H. Wolf, Kevin Keating and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
