Cases 41 - 50 of 56
MOON v. LOCKETT, et al.
as 2:2014cv00068
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL W. MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ARNOLD v. LAYTON et al
as 1:2014cv00368
Plaintiff:
KEANDRE ISAIAH ARNOLD
Defendant:
JOHN B. LAYTON, JAMES MARTIN, MCCATHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOON v. JOYNER et al
as 1:2013cv02012
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOON v. LOCKETT
as 1:2013cv02010
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Swisher v. Shepard et al
as 3:2013cv00773
Plaintiff:
Randy Marvin Swisher
Defendant:
Randall T Shepard, Robert D Rucker, Steven H David and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOON v. LOCKETT et al
as 1:2012cv00771
Defendant:
OFFICER BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, OFFICER BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Roby v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2011cv00191
Plaintiff:
James Roby
Defendant:
Tracy Sullivan, Dr Silbert and Darrell Himelick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAY v. LEMMAN et al
as 2:2011cv00141
Defendant:
DAVID BONNER, RICHARD BROWN, D. DAUGHERTY and others
Plaintiff:
KASHMIR L. BRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Lake County Jail & Staff et al
as 2:2010cv00382
Plaintiff:
Jordash Lu-Pree Harper
Defendant:
Lake County Jail & Staff, Sort Officer Percy, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TICKLE v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2009cv00267
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL WAYNE TICKLE
Defendant:
MITCHELL E. DANIELS, JR., EDWIN BUSS, ELTON AMOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
