Cases 41 - 50 of 2,501
Brown v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2024cv02154
Plaintiff:
Willie Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00217
Petitioner:
Darcel D. Wright
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Tennessee Board of Parole et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Corey Taylor
Defendant:
Tennessee Board of Parole and Dora Werner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Jermaine L. Hunter
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tennessee Board of Paroles and Amber Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. T.D.O.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wilson
Defendant:
T.D.O.C. and Tennessee Board of Parole and Probation The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Danielle Lynette Wright
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Stanley C. Dickerson, Talea Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cargile v. Meeks et al
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Shane Cargile
Defendant:
Isaac Meeks and Coffee County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2024cv02107
Petitioner:
Willie Brown, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dalton v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jeremy James Dalton
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Fentress County, Shane Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hester v. Chester County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2024cv01034
Plaintiff:
Michael Hester
Defendant:
Chester County, Tennessee, Blair Weaver, Mark Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
