Cases 41 - 50 of 98
NICASTRO v. BOROSKY et al
as 3:2015cv00326
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. NICASTRO
Defendant:
M. R. BOROSKY and TREVOR WINGARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. POSKA et al
as 2:2015cv01493
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARRIS
Defendant:
POSKA, C. PARKER, BRIAN COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAULK v. WEINGAR et al
as 2:2015cv01472
Petitioner:
DA'QUANE DUANE FAULK
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD , THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SYMMS v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2015cv01384
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER SYMMS
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vega v. State Of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2015cv02033
Petitioner:
Felipe Vega, Jr.
Respondent:
State Of Pennsylvania, Trevor Wingard and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITE v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2015cv01233
Petitioner:
RAYMOND WHITE
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BLACK v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2015cv04854
Petitioner:
DARRYL BLACK
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COLON v. WINGARD et al
as 3:2015cv01526
Petitioner:
Frank Colon
Respondent:
Trevor Wingard, The District Attorney of the County of York and The Attorney General Of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CHARLEMAGNE v. SUPERINTENDENT TREVOR WINGARD et al
as 3:2015cv00183
Plaintiff:
HAGGAI CHARLEMAGNE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT TREVOR WINGARD, C/O KEYSER, UNIT MANAGER ONSTEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICASTRO v. RITCHEY et al
as 3:2015cv00182
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. NICASTRO
Defendant:
P. JOEL RITCHEY, LORRIE EARNESTY, YLETTA CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
