Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Vargas v. State Department of Corrections, et al.
as 3:2012cv02207
Plaintiff:
Julio Cruz Vargas
Defendant:
State Department of Corrections, David A. Varano, Danny Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRACHT v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2012cv00089
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS A. PRACHT
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, STEVEN R. GLUNT, MR. PARKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vargas v. States Correction Medical Department et al
as 3:2011cv01442
Plaintiff:
Julio Cruz Vargas
Defendant:
States Correction Medical Department, David A. Varano, Kathy McCarty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VARGAS v. MEDICAL DEPARTMENT STAFF MEMBERS et al
as 2:2011cv02802
Plaintiff:
JULIO CRUZ VARGAS
Defendant:
MEDICAL DEPARTMENT STAFF MEMBERS, KATHY MCCARTY, CHRISTOPHER YACKIEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boomer v. Chief Director for US Marshals Jhon Doe for the Pennsylvania Station Middle District et al
as 3:2011cv00418
Plaintiff:
Rodney Boomer
Defendant:
Chief Director for US Marshals Jhon Doe for the Pennsylvania Station Middle District, Craig Lowe, Romance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EADDY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2011cv00177
Plaintiff:
LESTER EADDY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, CURRAN-FROMHOLD-CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LYNCH v. BAILEY et al
as 2:2010cv03346
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. LYNCH
Defendant:
BARBARA BAILEY, GREENLEE, VARGAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERSON v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2008cv03513
Plaintiff:
GARY PIERSON
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, RODNEY BROCKENBROUGH, JOYCE ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
VARGAS v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2008cv02687
Petitioner:
ANGELA VARGAS
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON, JOHN MORGANELLI and TOM CORBETT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
