Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 41 - 50 of 179
Wells v. Edge We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00061
Petitioner: Tony Wells
Respondent: D. Edge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Holmes v. Toby et al
as 1:2018cv01565
Plaintiff: Recardo Holmes
Defendant: Toby, Ivey, Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00172
Plaintiff: George W. Hardy
Defendant: Georgia Department of Corrections , Stan Shepard , Bruce Chatman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITED et al v. CHAPMAN et al
as 3:2017cv00152
Plaintiff: JUSTIN LEE WHITED, JOHN KELSEY CAIN, VI, JOHN CHRISTOPHER CALHOUN, II and others
Defendant: JOE CHAPMAN, KEITH BROOKS, MONK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Flourney We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00065
Petitioner: Tony Wells
Respondent: J. V. Flourney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wright v. State of Georgia, et al et al
as 4:2016cv00289
Plaintiff: Byron Scott Wright
Defendant: State of Georgia, et al, Polk County Georgia, et al, Baldwin County CSH Georgia, et al and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00134
Petitioner: Tony Wells
Respondent: J. V. Flourney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STEWART v. LEWIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00360
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER STEWART
Defendant: SHARON LEWIS and WAYNE WELLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYLES v. SMITH et al
as 5:2015cv00292
Plaintiff: WINSTON HAYLES
Defendant: SMITH, CEDRIC TAYLOR, WELLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers et al v. Wells Fargo Bank
as 1:2015cv02629
Plaintiff: Donald Flowers, Flowers Concrete & Recycling and H2D Mechanical Designs
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?