Cases 41 - 50 of 128
HALE v. BOTTOMS et al
as 3:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ROSS HALE
Defendant:
TIMOTHY BOTTOMS, C.O. WOODS, C.O. 001 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaCroix v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00193
Defendant:
DeAngelo Dove, Christopher Erwing, Brandon French and others
Plaintiff:
Terry LaCroix and Terry Lynn LaCroix
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYBERRY v. SMITH et al
as 2:2021cv00467
Plaintiff:
PAUL MAYBERRY
Defendant:
SMITH, K. BOWILLA, HANCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. WEDDING et al
as 3:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
CAMERSON J. THOMPSON and CAMERON J. THOMPSON
Defendant:
DAVE WEDDING, COWLING, CULVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. NAJJAR et al
as 2:2021cv00318
Plaintiff:
QUANTAE A. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID K. NAJJAR, TODD RUETZ, JUDITH PROFFITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00448
Defendant:
Pearson, E Lowe, Croft and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Wells et al
as 3:2021cv00379
Defendant:
Emillia Sheaffer, Jean Lavrore and Nicole Wells
Plaintiff:
Blayse Harrison Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Wells et al
as 4:2021cv00034
Defendant:
Emillia Sheaffer, Jean Lavrore and Nicole Wells
Plaintiff:
Blayse Harrison Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2021cv00256
Defendant:
Quality Correctional Care, Wabash Co Sheriffs Dept, Indiana State of and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Neal et al
as 3:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
Michael J Love and Michael Love
Defendant:
Ronald Neal, Tiffiny Turner, Buckman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
