Cases 41 - 50 of 332
Stockton v. McGinley et al
as 1:2022cv00902
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Defendant:
Superintendent Thomas McGinley, Deputy Sec'y Robert Marsh, Deputy Superintendent Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Antwan L. Richardson
Defendant:
Brian S. Clark, William W. Young, Doug Macut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. ENDERS et al
as 1:2021cv00356
Plaintiff:
SCOTTY E. BROWN
Defendant:
SHANE ENDERS, SGT. YOUNG and LT. DUDAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JOHNAKIN et al v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL et al
as 5:2021cv05366
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOHNAKIN and CHRIS YOUNG
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL, BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM, WARDEN JEFFERY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. HARPER et al
as 2:2021cv01519
Plaintiff:
CARL S. JONES, JR.
Defendant:
ORLANDO L. HARPER, CHAD CUTSHALL, C.O. SCHROTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
YOUNG v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2021cv04718
Plaintiff:
REGINALD YOUNG
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, LEO DUNN, VICTOR W. WILLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. NEWMAN et al
as 1:2021cv00272
Plaintiff:
THORNE THOMAS
Defendant:
CO1 NEWMAN, CO1 BECKER, SGT. YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MITCHELL v. LOW et al
as 1:2021cv01663
Plaintiff:
Juwan Mitchell
Defendant:
Andrew Low, Inmate Young and Co Millae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNGER v. REDDICK et al
as 2:2021cv01189
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER YOUNGER
Defendant:
REDDICK, RAIBLE, SARVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ORTIZ v. P.I.C.C.
as 2:2021cv03813
Plaintiff:
ANDY ORTIZ
Defendant:
P.I.C.C., C/O: GIBSON, C/O: BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
