Cases 41 - 50 of 102,881
Rosales-Ramires v. USA
as 6:2024cv00201
Petitioner:
Saul Rosales-Ramires
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Richards v. Schmoker
as 5:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
James Richards
Respondent:
Wayne Schmoker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. USA
as 3:2024cv01350
Petitioner:
Ladavid Sims
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Byrd v. Woodburn et al
as 2:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Norman Lashan Byrd
Defendant:
Douglas Woodburn, Timothy Wade Burson, Ana Esteves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Sean Hicks
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Unknown makers and seller of TDCJ's Algorythym computer, Unknown implementors of the unknown algorythym computor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dowell v. DOJ MRU FOIA et al
as 6:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Robert Raymond Dowell
Defendant:
DOJ MRU FOIA, Madill Sheriff Department and Secret Service Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fusilier v. Singletary et al
as 1:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Gregory Fusilier
Defendant:
James P Singletary, Roy West, Zena Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02126
Petitioner:
James Burchard Simpson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corona v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Keith L Corona
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Shows Urquidi v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00192
Petitioner:
Arturo Shows Urquidi
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
