Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 431
Saplan v. McDonald et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv04708
Plaintiff: Reynaldo Saplan
Defendant: H. Richard McDonald, Judy Chen and Charles Ng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Johnson v. Thuddy, et al
as 22-16116
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee: THUDDY, M.D., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D., L. W. ROHLFING, M.D. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04250
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lin v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01457
Petitioner: Xiao Chen Lin
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Price v. Chen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv03243
Plaintiff: Marcus Price
Defendant: Dr. James H. Chen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yuh-Yue Chen v. USA
as 22-55397
Petitioner / Appellant: YUH-YUE CHEN
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01866
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01889
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00863
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Yuh-Yue Chen v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv00203
Petitioner: Yuh-Yue Chen
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?