Cases 541 - 550 of 22,926
Zulu v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv01469
Plaintiff:
Muzuz Mussun Ali Bamu Zulu and Milton Dudley
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Karen Williams, Elizabeth Laseter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Justin Terrell Gordon
Defendant:
Karen Carter and Steven T. Marshall
Respondent:
Rolanda Calloway and Pamela Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Schroeder (INMATE 3)
as 3:2023cv00610
Plaintiff:
Sterling R. Davis and Sterling Ramonno Davis
Defendant:
Michael Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cisneros v. Neeley
as 7:2023cv01165
Petitioner:
Fabiola Perez Cisneros
Respondent:
Kimberly Neeley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv01208
Plaintiff:
Amir Davis
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Blount County Correctional Facility
as 5:2023cv01244
Plaintiff:
Shallowmist Martin
Defendant:
Blount County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rumph v. Thomas et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
Reggie Lee Rumph
Defendant:
Nurse Thomas and Nurse Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alcocer-Cordoba v. Neely et al
as 7:2023cv01168
Petitioner:
Juana Idalia Alcocer-Cordoba
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Daniels v. Watson (INMATE 1)
as 1:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
Dr. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. YesCare Corp. et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Dewon Clarniel Jones
Defendant:
YesCare Corp. and Wilcotte Rahming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
