Cases 51 - 60 of 81
SAINTIGNON v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00560
Plaintiff:
DANNY L. SAINTIGNON, JR.
Defendant:
DENNIS MEYER and WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Warden
as 3:2018cv00910
Petitioner:
Joe M Meyers
Respondent:
Warden
Undetermined:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MEYERS v. BROWN et al
as 1:2017cv02871
Defendant:
BARLOW, DICK BROWN, JONES and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MEYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. GEO MENTAL HEALTH et al
as 1:2016cv03492
Defendant:
GEO MENTAL HEALTH and OFFICER TUTT
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MEYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Allen County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv00362
Plaintiff:
Charles A Benson
Defendant:
Allen County Jail, Charles Hart, Purden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHARLES v. HOOD et al
as 1:2016cv00280
Defendant:
DUANNE ALSIP, J. HOOD, C. MEYERS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL CHARLES
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2015cv00297
Petitioner:
ANTHONY MEYERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FRALEY v. KELLOGE et al
as 4:2015cv00089
Defendant:
CAPEHART, DOOLEY, JORDAN KELLOGE and others
Plaintiff:
HARRISON TEDDY FRALEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STUDY v. MEYER et al
as 2:2015cv00101
Plaintiff:
JOHN STUDY
Defendant:
TODD J. MEYER, KEN CAMPBELL, MATTHEW C. KINCAID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUTHERFORD v. MEYER et al
as 4:2015cv00011
Defendant:
LEVOIS DAVIS, ISENBURG, KNAFER and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW ALAN RUTHERFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
