Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Carey v. USA
as 4:2010cv02375
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Floyd Carey, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Carey v. USA
as 1:2010cv01824
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Damon Todd Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wilson v. Luzerne County Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2010cv00485
Plaintiff:
Saleem Andrew Wilson
Defendant:
Luzerne County Correctional Facility, Larson, Kimsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. LUZERNE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2009cv03752
Plaintiff:
SALEEM ANDREW WILSON
Defendant:
LUZERNE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOSEPH PIAZZA, MIKE ROSTOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KUEHNER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2009cv00749
Plaintiff:
TERRY KUEHNER
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFREY BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. Karnes et al
as 3:2009cv01008
Plaintiff:
William Maldonado
Defendant:
Robert Karnes, J. Carey and Tina Verna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOWARD et al v. JONES et al
as 1:2008cv00308
Plaintiff:
MORRIS HOWARD, SHAWN BROWN, JOSEPH MCGOLGON and others
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, RAYMOND SOBINA, BARONE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lumpkin v. Reitz et al
as 3:2008cv00203
Plaintiff:
Stanley Lumpkin
Defendant:
Earl Reitz, Mike Carey, Lisa Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Williamson et al
as 1:2007cv01418
Petitioner:
Darrell James Parks
Respondent:
Troy Williamson, S Scott, Harris and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Newton v. Reitz et al
as 3:2007cv01254
Defendant:
Carlisle Reitz, Prime Care Medical Inc., Mike Carey and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
