Cases 51 - 60 of 172
Jackson v. Burgess et al
as 1:2021cv00724
Defendant:
Sheila Burgess, Tim Burgess, Alabama, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Cynthia R Jackson and Cynthia R Davis Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dominguez v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2020cv02014
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Wendy Williams, Alabama, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Ana Dominguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2020cv01977
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Alabama Department of Pardons and Paroles, Steve Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cargill v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2020cv01953
Respondent:
Alabama, State of and United States
Petitioner:
Quincetta Y. Cargill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taite v. Alabama State Governor et al
as 7:2020cv01021
Defendant:
Spencer B., Walker, Kay Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus O Taite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tatum v. Montgomery County et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00241
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Montgomery County Sheriff Department, State of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Oscar Tatum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jews v. Alabama, State of
as 1:2020cv00364
Plaintiff:
Deunate Tarez Jews
Defendant:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fisher v. McCorquodale et al
as 1:2020cv00125
Defendant:
Alabama State Treasurer, Kay Ivey, Gaines G McCorquodale and others
Plaintiff:
Manson Fisher, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willingham v. Director of Alabama State Personnel Department et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2020cv00056
Defendant:
Mekel Jackson, Johnny M. Portis, Kayla Albritton and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Eugene Willingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dinkle v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv01052
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Ellie Hester, Sandra Conway and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Joshua Dinkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
