Cases 51 - 60 of 168
DAVILA v. PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION P.D.P. et al
as 2:2018cv00774
Plaintiff:
BASILIO DAVILA
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION P.D.P., BLANCHE CARNEY, ROBERT L. TOMASZEWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MASSEY v. HOLMAN et al
as 1:2017cv00292
Plaintiff:
WESLEY A. MASSEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL HOLMAN, D.W. BRYANT, JASON STEVENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CLARK et al
as 5:2017cv04393
Petitioner:
BRYANT KEVIN JOHNSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BERKS COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. CLARK et al
as 1:2017cv00233
Petitioner:
BRYANT KEVIN JOHNSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BERKS COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bryant v. PA State Attorney General
as 1:2017cv01349
Petitioner:
Travis Lamont Bryant
Respondent:
PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRYANT v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2017cv02249
Petitioner:
CARLTON BRYANT
Respondent:
MARK GARMAN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRYANT v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2017cv01615
Petitioner:
BARBARA BRYANT
Respondent:
SETH WILLIAMS, JAQUAN LIGHTFOOT and THE ATTORNEYGENRAL OF THE STATE OF JOHN SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRYANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv01129
Petitioner:
JOHN BRYANT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CANNON v. PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PA (TOWNSHIP)
as 2:2016cv05668
Plaintiff:
BRYANT CANNON
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PA (TOWNSHIP)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv03892
Plaintiff:
DANTE JACKSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, WATKINS, KAREN BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
