Cases 51 - 60 of 102
James v. Coleman Staff-Administraghtion et al
as 9:2013cv02448
Plaintiff:
Zljahuc L James
Defendant:
Coleman Staff-Administraghtion and O-Shu-Officer Lafave
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Byars et al
as 6:2012cv03187
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Warren
Defendant:
William R Byars, Jr, Gregory T Knowlin, Kennth Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Warren v. Holder et al
as 3:2012cv02680
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Warren
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Joyce Zoldak, William G Stewart, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Coleman v. York County Detention Center et al
as 1:2012cv02102
Plaintiff:
William Theoplas Coleman
Defendant:
York County Detention Center, Khatari McMillan and Other York County Detention Center Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. SCDC et al
as 1:2012cv02055
Plaintiff:
William T Coleman
Defendant:
SCDC, Bernard Mackey, Unknown SCDC Defendants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. York County Detention Center et al
as 1:2012cv01916
Plaintiff:
William T Coleman
Defendant:
York County Detention Center and Khalari McMillian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lott v. Bradshaw et al
as 2:2012cv01190
Plaintiff:
Mark Tillman Lott
Defendant:
Linda Bradshaw, Kenneth Sharp and Kevin Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cokley v. Sharpe et al
as 9:2012cv00396
Plaintiff:
Edmund Cokley
Defendant:
K Sharpe, Captain Kelly, Cpt Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Fallen et al
as 0:2012cv00304
Plaintiff:
Dontay Markeith Wells
Defendant:
D Fallen, C Collie, K Vining and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Laubshire et al
as 6:2012cv00236
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
M V Laubshire, William R Byars, Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
