Cases 51 - 60 of 563
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 1:2022cv00985
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Attorney General's Offices of the State of Illinois, The, Kimberly Foxx and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Javaid v. Palackic et al
as 1:2021cv06335
Plaintiff:
Irfan Javaid
Defendant:
S Palackic, EK Hunger, E Peci and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marion v. Sheriff Office (Cook County) et al
as 1:2021cv05950
Plaintiff:
Areon Marion
Defendant:
Sheriff Office (Cook County), Cook County Department of Corrections, Roti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cummings v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv05914
Plaintiff:
Dennis Cummings
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Michael Pettis, Stacy Toms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mansoori v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv04097
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mansoori
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Chicago Police Officers, M.J Silius and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv03494
Defendant:
Nate Wackman, Sanford Roth, William Marback and others
Plaintiff:
Chet Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. City of Chicago, a municipal corporation et al
as 1:2021cv02955
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, City of Chicago, a municipal corporation and Chicago Police Department
Plaintiff:
Darius Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
King v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv02625
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, City of Chicago, Chicago Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Lazarick King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montanez v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv02401
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Cook County Jail, City of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Javier Montanez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huggins v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv02359
Defendant:
The City of Chicago
Plaintiff:
Gregory Huggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
