Cases 51 - 60 of 359
MOORE, SR. v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE et al
as 2:2021cv02880
Respondent:
BOROUGH HALL POLICE DEPARTMENT, RICHARD H. BRADBURY, JR., CRAIG A. JOHNSON and others
Petitioner:
JEREMIAH MOORE, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NUNEZ v. FISHER et al
as 5:2021cv02343
Defendant:
DERRICK FISHER, PATRICK BARRETT, JEREMY SCHOENOR and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE ENRIQUE NUNEZ, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alford v. Haidle et al
as 1:2021cv00876
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Garry Haidle
Petitioner:
Craig A. Alford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ice v. Warden of SCI-Benner Township et al
as 3:2021cv00402
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Benner Township and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Petitioner:
Craig David Ice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Tonkin et al
as 2:2021cv00861
Plaintiff:
Keeba Scott Harris
Defendant:
OFFICER RAYMOND TONKIN and CRAIG LOWE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PINER et al v. BUREAU OF NARCOTICS et al
as 3:2021cv00025
Defendant:
AGENT ALBERT ADAMS, CHRISTOPHER MOSER, TERRY WALTERS and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J. PINER and STEPHEN PINER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Rad v. Lowe et al
as 1:2021cv00030
Petitioner:
Christopher Rad
Respondent:
Craig A. Lowe and United States of America Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wilkins v. Wolf et al
as 1:2020cv02450
Defendant:
Scott W. Walters, John Wetzel, Tom Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice A. Wilkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALFORD v. PENCHISHEN et al
as 5:2020cv06197
Defendant:
DAVID PENCHISHEN, JANE/JOHN DOE, GARRY HAIDLE and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG ALFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dougan v. Lowe et al
as 1:2020cv02181
Petitioner:
Andrew J. Dougan
Respondent:
Raymond Tonkin, Pennsylvania Attorney General Office and Craig Lowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
