Cases 51 - 60 of 69
Else v. Clarke et al
as 2:2013cv00476
Plaintiff:
Craig Alan Else
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Sandra Thacker and Beth Arthur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee et al v. Toepp et al
as 2:2012cv00500
Plaintiff:
Curtis R. Lee, Jr. and Deborah Charity
Defendant:
Christopher Toepp, Michael Herring, Bernard Adam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Northwestern Regional Adult Detention Center et al
as 7:2012cv00365
Defendant:
Captain Barr, Superintendent Bruce Conover, Fredrick County Administrations and others
Plaintiff:
Craig L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Young et al
as 7:2012cv00192
Defendant:
Anderson, Bandy, Buckannon and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vineyard v. Blackstock et al
as 7:2012cv00072
Defendant:
Cpt. Atkins, Elton Blackstock, Major Carrie Craig and others
Plaintiff:
William Odels Vineyard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 2:2011cv00571
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Beaverly Perdue, Melanie A. Shekita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 2:2011cv00500
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Beaverly Perdue, Melanie A. Shekita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Young et al
as 3:2011cv00516
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. McCoy
Defendant:
S. K. Young, J. W. Cumbee, Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pasicov v. Holder et al
as 1:2011cv00487
Petitioner:
Craig John Pasicov
Respondent:
Eric Himpton Holder, Jr. , Janet Napolitano and John T. Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Craig v. Watson
as 7:2010cv00199
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Craig
Defendant:
Warden Bryan B. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
