Cases 51 - 60 of 107
Anderson v. Boyd et al
as 3:2017cv00811
Plaintiff:
Kersee K Anderson
Defendant:
John Boyd, John Wilcher and Derrick Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sawyer v. Boyd et al
as 3:2017cv00810
Plaintiff:
Lennie J Sawyer, III
Defendant:
John Boyd, Derrick Allen and John Wilcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTINEZ-JOHNSON v. BROWN
as 2:2017cv00351
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Petitioner:
DERRICK MARTINEZ-JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Griffin et al
as 3:2017cv00551
Plaintiff:
Derrick Baker
Defendant:
K Griffin, Tucker, M Schoettmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. GRIFFIN et al
as 1:2017cv02247
Defendant:
ASHLEY, GREEN, K. GRIFFIN and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEANS v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2017cv00231
Respondent:
RICHARD BROWN and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner:
DERRICK MICHAEL MEANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. St Joseph County et al
as 3:2017cv00359
Plaintiff:
Derrick Terrell Lee
Defendant:
St Joseph County, State of Indiana, Tyler Donlon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTINEZ-JOHNSON v. SUPERINTENDENT OF WVCF
as 2:2017cv00081
Petitioner:
DERRICK MARTINEZ-JOHNSON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OF WVCF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AVERITTE v. BUGHER et al
as 1:2016cv03502
Petitioner:
DERRICK AVERITTE
Respondent:
ROBERT BUGHER, K. HARTZELL, STANLEY KNIGHT and others
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VOGT v. USA
as 3:2016cv00129
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DERRICK W. VOGT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
