Cases 51 - 60 of 86
Brown v. Falk et al
as 3:2007cv00515
Plaintiff:
Bubba Brown
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, J David Donahue and Ed Buss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samson et al v. Donahue et al
as 3:2007cv00505
Plaintiff:
Maurice A Samson and Cathy Samson
Defendant:
J David Donahue and Indiana State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLER v. DONAHUE
as 1:2007cv01250
Petitioner:
JOHN WAYNE KELLER, JR.
Respondent:
J. DAVID DONAHUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROYAL v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2007cv01224
Petitioner:
VALGENE ROYAL
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, DAVID J. DONAHUE and CHRISTOPHER MELOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Voss v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 3:2007cv00449
Plaintiff:
Robert A Voss
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Correction, Correctional Medical Services Medical Staff, David Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROYAL v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2007cv01208
Petitioner:
VALGENE ROYAL
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT, DAVID J. DONAHUE and CHRISTOPHER MELOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Batchelder v. Donahue et al
as 2:2007cv00313
Plaintiff:
Vonzell Batchelder
Defendant:
David Donahue, Cecil K Davis and John J Widup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Donahue et al
as 3:2007cv00342
Plaintiff:
Franklin J Cox
Defendant:
David Donahue, Dawn Buss, Sgt Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ketchum v. Donahue et al
as 3:2007cv00316
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ketchum
Defendant:
J David Donahue, Aramark Food Service, Dean Reiger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Hjerquist et al
as 3:2007cv00310
Plaintiff:
Jaquell L Dixon
Defendant:
D Hjerquist, John R Vanatta and J David Donahue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
