Cases 51 - 60 of 833
Dudley v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00451
Petitioner:
Christopher Dudley
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Springer v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Chadwick Dotson, Director of Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Demetrius D. Wallace
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson, Gregory Holloway, Rick White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patrick Carmody v. TDOC, et al
as 24-5243
Plaintiff:
PATRICK S. CARMODY
Defendant:
TDOC, FRANK STRADA, Commissioner, in his individual and official capacities, LEE DOTSON, Asst. Commissioner, in his official and individual capacities and others
Khalil Salahuddin v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6245
Petitioner:
KHALIL SALAHUDDIN
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON
Stephens v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00170
Petitioner:
Derek J. Stephens
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Levi Springer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6229
Petitioner:
LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of VA DOC
Moyler v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Thomas Moyler and Shiek Thomas Moyler-Bey
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, D. Anderson, J. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Puller v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Toccara Puller
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinard, Christian v. Marczewski, Lt. et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Christian Kindard and Christian Kinard
Defendant:
Lt. Marczewski, Captain Peters, Captain Bonfiglio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
