Cases 51 - 60 of 78
Harrison v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00810
Petitioner:
Mark Mundy Harrison
Respondent:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Broadhead v. Calhoun et al
as 2:2014cv00634
Plaintiff:
James M Broadhead
Defendant:
Calhoun, Scott, Evelgor Dorsett and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Simpson et al
as 2:2014cv00533
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
C Simpson, S. Harrison, Jason Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Oliver et al
as 1:2014cv00085
Plaintiff:
Raymond Harrison
Defendant:
Noah Price Oliver, Mobile County Sheriff Department, Mobile County Metro Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Foster et al
as 2:2014cv00234
Plaintiff:
James M Broadhead
Defendant:
Foster, Aaron Lewis, Harrison and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2014cv00110
Plaintiff:
David Boy Fuller
Defendant:
Baldwin, Poe, Dimi and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Carter
as 4:2013cv00011
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harrison
Defendant:
Richard Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00984
Plaintiff:
Brian Heath Harrison
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers, Phelix Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. The State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00778
Plaintiff:
Stacy Lashun Harrison
Defendant:
The State of Alabama, Robert Nielsen and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harrison v. Hetzel (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00652
Plaintiff:
Brian Heath Harrison
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
