Cases 51 - 60 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Franks v. McClain et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00613
Plaintiff:
James Edward Franks
Defendant:
CO I McClain, CO I Nolen, COI Terry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gary v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2007cv01074
Plaintiff:
James Edward Gary, Jr.
Defendant:
Kenny Jones and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bagley v. Holt et al
as 4:2007cv01786
Plaintiff:
James Edward Bagley
Defendant:
Arnold Holt and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bagley v. Holt et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2007cv00802
Plaintiff:
James Edward Bagley
Defendant:
Arnold Holt and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace v. Norton et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv00762
Plaintiff:
James Edward Wallace
Defendant:
Billy Norton, Bobby Joe Jordan, Richard Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. King et al
as 4:2007cv00791
Plaintiff:
James Edward Spencer
Defendant:
Troy King, Bob Riley, Gene Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bagley v. Price et al
as 7:2007cv00778
Petitioner:
James Edward Bagley
Respondent:
Cheryl Price, Bob Riley and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bagley v. Price et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2007cv00264
Plaintiff:
James Edward Bagley
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Bob Riley and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bagley v. Anniston Police Dept. et al
as 7:2007cv00432
Plaintiff:
James Edward Bagley
Defendant:
Anniston Police Dept. and Ted Hooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
