Cases 51 - 60 of 2,037
Loyde v. Odom et al
as 2:2024cv02202
Plaintiff:
Ed Henry Loyde
Defendant:
Sheriff Odom, John Doe - Officer, Jane Doe - Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wooten et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Angular Wooten and Leroy Wooten
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Key et al
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Bryan Keith Hall
Defendant:
John Key and Wesley Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Rathal Perkins
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Gay et al
as 3:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
John Ellis Welch
Defendant:
Dee David Gay, Sumner County Jail, Tara A. Wyllie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doss v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Harold Doss
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wooden v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv01052
Plaintiff:
John H. Wooden and Jabari I. Mandela
Defendant:
William Lee, David Raush, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lindberg v. Clendenion et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
John Lindberg
Defendant:
Jason Clendenion, Josesph Gilbert, Ted Baltimore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Clifton D. Craig
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
