Cases 51 - 60 of 1,187
Grimes v. Noe et al
as 5:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Tony Eugene Grimes
Defendant:
Guy Noe, Mitchell, N Estelle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riggins v. Jones et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Darryl D. Riggins
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, Teresa Norman, Mr. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Rogers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Roger Jay Jones, II
Defendant:
Courtney B. Rogers and Officer Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cameron v. Hamm et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Leslie D. Cameron and Leslie Dewayne Cameron
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Warden Thompkins, Warden Lamar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Shavers et al
as 4:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tommie Jermaine Jones
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeff Shavers, Sierra Wilkes, Michael Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. Siddiq et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Tahir Siddiq, David Lamar, Patrice Richie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. Hamm et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Karen Carter, Christopher Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Holcomb et al
as 2:2022cv01527
Plaintiff:
Elmore Cook, Jr
Defendant:
Holcomb, Coats, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Cunningham et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Bernard Mosley
Defendant:
Shirley Cunningham, Officer Floyd and Patrice Richie Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
