Cases 51 - 60 of 607
Jones v. Wheeler
as 0:2022cv03313
Plaintiff:
Jason T. Jones
Defendant:
Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. Vermeer et al
as 0:2022cv03312
Plaintiff:
Jason T. Jones
Defendant:
Vermeer and Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. Snyder
as 0:2022cv03311
Plaintiff:
Jason T. Jones
Defendant:
Snyder and Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Pendarvis v. Wilson et al
as 2:2022cv03142
Plaintiff:
John Trenton Pendarvis
Defendant:
Alan M. Wilson, Mark A. Keel, Hugh E. Weathers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Williams v. Janson et al
as 4:2022cv03101
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Williams
Defendant:
Warden Janson, C. Jones, C. Mayson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Jones v. Kiser et al
as 0:2022cv02797
Plaintiff:
Jason T. Jones
Defendant:
Officer Kiser, Smith, Chau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Johnson v. Standridge et al
as 8:2022cv02630
Plaintiff:
Joshua Terrell Johnson
Defendant:
Brittany Standridge, Summer Snyder, Jane Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Jones v. Mediko Inc et al
as 5:2022cv02387
Plaintiff:
Antonio L Jones
Defendant:
Mediko Inc, Phillip Thompson, Marcus Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. Richardson et al
as 6:2022cv02162
Plaintiff:
Edward G. Jones
Defendant:
Doug Richardson, Stuart Sarrat, Brandon Prino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. Richardson et al
as 9:2022cv02161
Petitioner:
Edward G. Jones
Respondent:
Doug Richardson, Stuart Sarrat and Director of the Greenville County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
