Cases 51 - 60 of 116
Jones v. President of South Africa et al
as 1:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
President of South Africa, Iraq, Kuwait and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Rappahannock Regional Jail Members of Board of Directors et al
as 1:2015cv00007
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail Members of Board of Directors, Commonwealth's Attorney for Virginia, County King George and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris, III v. Mackey et al
as 1:2014cv01775
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Morris, III
Defendant:
Mr. Mackey, G. Scott and Joseph Higgs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Virginia State Police et al
as 1:2014cv01683
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Virginia State Police, Stafford County Sheriff's Office, Rappahannock Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2014cv01685
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Rappahannock Regional Jail, Joseph Higgs, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Rappahannock Regional Jail et al
as 1:2014cv01679
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail, Angelone, Joseph Higgs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Rappahannock Regional Jail et al
as 1:2014cv01681
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail, Hartman, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Mwiczalkowski et al
as 1:2014cv01677
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Mwiczalkowski, Trull, Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owaiian Jones v. Scott Baird
as 14-7807
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT BAIRD, JOSEPH HIGGS, DAILY and others
Jones v. Higgs et al
as 1:2014cv01665
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Joseph Higgs, Jr., Phil Grimes, Lynn Balamula and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
