Cases 51 - 60 of 74
Williamson v. Varano et al
as 3:2012cv02460
Plaintiff:
Sharif Williamson
Defendant:
David Varano, A. Luscavage, T Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gadra-Lord v. Varano et al
as 1:2012cv02426
Plaintiff:
Jonathon K. Gadra-Lord
Defendant:
David A. Varano, Anthony Luscavage, George Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2012cv01853
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Kelley
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, David W. Lupas, Peter Paul Olszenski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUYNA v. SAUERS et al
as 2:2012cv00691
Petitioner:
ALLAN D. BUYNA
Respondent:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, STEPHEN ZAPALLA and LINDA L KELLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Buyna v. Sauers et al
as 3:2012cv00962
Petitioner:
Allan D Buyna
Respondent:
Debra K. Sauers, Stephen Zapalla and Linda L Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOYER v. LAMAS et al
as 5:2012cv01908
Petitioner:
BRUCE GREGORY BOYER
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, CRAIG STEAELMEN and LINDA KELLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ryder v. Varano et al
as 3:2012cv00614
Plaintiff:
Nelson Ryder
Defendant:
David A. Varano, Ronda Ellet, Janet Bartholomew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Varano et al
as 3:2012cv00529
Plaintiff:
La-Qun Rasheed Williams
Defendant:
David A. Varano, Ronda Ellett, George Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLEY v. SAUERS et al
as 2:2011cv00624
Petitioner:
LARRY EDWARD KELLEY, JR.
Respondent:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF FAYETTE, PA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COOLEY v. DOCTOR RICHARD ZEWE, DMD et al
as 3:2011cv00099
Plaintiff:
KELLEY TROY COOLEY
Defendant:
DOCTOR RICHARD ZEWE, DMD, FACILITY MANAGER MELVIN S. LOCKETT, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
