Cases 51 - 60 of 79
Thomas v. Owens, et al
as 08-20299
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES SCOT THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
ED OWENS, JAY T MORGAN, ERNEST H GUTIERREZ, JR. and others
Tuft v. State of Texas, et al
as 08-20168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT A TUFT
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, BRENDA CHANEY, former Warden of Jester 3 Unit, KATHREN GONZALES, Assist. Warden of the Jester 3 Unit and others
Florence v. Carronza et al
as 3:2008cv00073
Plaintiff:
Thomas W Florence
Defendant:
L. Carronza, Christopher Buiesing, Melissa Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Florence v. Carronza et al
as 4:2008cv00754
Plaintiff:
Thomas Florence
Defendant:
Linda Carronza, Christopher Buiesing, Kerry Drozd and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Curbow v. Jackson, et al
as 08-10208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES CURBOW
Defendant - Appellee:
STACY L JACKSON, GARY J STANTON, Security Lieutenant, JONATHAN L LEUCK, Security Sergeant and others
Johnson v. Miller, et al
as 08-10153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD J JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
J MILLER, KELLY WARD, GALBREAITH and others
Mark v. Micheal et al
as 3:2008cv00036
Petitioner:
Sidney L Mark
Respondent:
Venetia Micheal, Kelly Ward and Buddy Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foreman v. Wilkinson et al
as 7:2007cv00181
Plaintiff:
Percy Foreman
Defendant:
D Wilkinson, B Tinkham, J Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamb v. Mendoza et al
as 2:2007cv00449
Plaintiff:
Michael Ted Lamb
Defendant:
Oscar Mendoza, Maximilliano Herrera, Lori Willeford and others
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mata v. Nichols et al
as 6:2007cv00374
Plaintiff:
Carlos Mata
Defendant:
T. Nichols, G. L. Stephenson and Kelli Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
