Cases 51 - 60 of 381
Krushin v. Wolff et al
as 4:2021cv01682
Plaintiff:
Raymond Krushin
Defendant:
Tom Wolff, Joshua Shapiro, John Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLAMER v. BRADLEY et al
as 2:2021cv04326
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY JEROME FLAMER
Defendant:
G. BRADLEY, MS. EMMIT, LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. HARRY et al
as 2:2021cv04176
Petitioner:
WILLIAM LEWIS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MS. HARRY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON et al v. CLAYHURST et al
as 2:2021cv04156
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON, LESSIE POWELL, RASHID POWELL and others
Defendant:
HAROLD CLAYHURST, JILL BRADY, GORDON GALLAGHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALVIN et al v. CHESTER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2021cv03903
Plaintiff:
BRANDON ALVIN, KEITH BRIGGS, RACHEL BRIGGS and others
Defendant:
CHESTER TOWNSHIP, CHESTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, PASQUALE STORACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MASSAQUOI v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01170
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, STEPHEN BUZAS, MAUREEN MALANOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv03864
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEWIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SCOTT v. MOONEY et al
as 3:2021cv00116
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
CAPTAIN RICHARD A. MOONEY, CAPTAIN LEWIS, C/O1 P.H. BLOOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LEWIS v. PERRY et al
as 1:2021cv00174
Plaintiff:
ANDRE LEWIS
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER PERRY, CARTER and COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RIECO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv00836
Defendant:
MS. SHREVE, C/O 4 ELZMUND, JOSHUA LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
