Cases 51 - 60 of 307
JOHNSON v. WENEROWICZ
as 2:2015cv06029
Plaintiff:
DARREN JOHNSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MORRIS v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2015cv05969
Plaintiff:
TYREE MORRIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, JOHN WETZEL, JOSEPH C. KORSZNIAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv05718
Petitioner:
CALVIN ADAMS
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, SCI - GRATERFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kenneth Miller, et al v. Michael Wenerowicz
as 15-3481
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH MILLER
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TINA R. TURNER-MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ
WRIGHT v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv05109
Plaintiff:
ANDRE WRIGHT
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, SUPERINTENDENT OF THE STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT GRATERFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BIVENS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv04851
Petitioner:
BRAHEEM BIVENS
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WASHINGTON v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2015cv04102
Plaintiff:
JEROME WASHINGTON
Defendant:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, CHRISTOPHER, KORSZNIAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2015cv03265
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI GRATERFORD, SGT. UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNDT v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2015cv02729
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BARNDT
Defendant:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, JOHN E. WETZEL, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPRINGS v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02684
Plaintiff:
CODY SPRINGS
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
