Cases 51 - 60 of 66
Stokes v. Moorman et al
as 9:2010cv01168
Plaintiff:
Charles Michael Stokes
Defendant:
Andrew Moorman, Keith Morecraft, Charles Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. USA
as 0:2010cv70174
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Murphy, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Green v. BCDC et al
as 6:2010cv00429
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Harold Green
Defendant:
BCDC, HFDC, BC Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Twitty v. SCDC Medical Department Representatives et al
as 0:2010cv00392
Plaintiff:
Irving E Twitty
Defendant:
SCDC Medical Department Representatives, J Valpey, D Jacques and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kelly v. Young et al
as 8:2009cv02848
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Kelly
Defendant:
Herman Young, Brad Douglas, Ross Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Drakeford v. Thompson et al
as 2:2009cv02239
Plaintiff:
Tremayne Lamont Drakeford
Defendant:
Glenda Thompson, Linda Seneca, Miriam Ciccolone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Dalton v. South Carolina Dept of Corrections et al
as 8:2009cv00260
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Dalton
Defendant:
South Carolina Dept of Corrections, Prison Health Services, Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Murphy v. Hagan
as 8:2008cv02432
Petitioner:
Bernard Murphy
Respondent:
George T Hagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malik v. Ward et al
as 8:2008cv01886
Plaintiff:
Habeeb Abdul Malik
Defendant:
Robert Ward, NFN Smalls, Lt McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knight v. Ozmint et al
as 0:2008cv00662
Plaintiff:
Frederick Knight
Defendant:
John Ozmint, Willie L Eagleton, Daniel Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
