Cases 51 - 60 of 115
Freeman v. Indiana Department of Corrections Commissioner et al
as 3:2014cv01987
Plaintiff:
de'Carlos Freeman
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections Commissioner, M Rizner, C McKinney and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beard v. Global Polymers LLC et al
as 3:2014cv01779
Plaintiff:
Raymond Beard
Defendant:
Global Polymers LLC, Corizon Health Services, Mark Levenhagen and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Leavenhagen et al
as 1:2014cv00211
Plaintiff:
Larry Allen Stone
Defendant:
Mark Leavenhagen and Mike Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. SCOTT
as 2:2014cv00209
Petitioner:
JOSHUA OWENS
Respondent:
MIKE SCOTT and SUPERINTENDENT OF WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baluha v. Lee County et al
as 2:2014cv00217
Plaintiff:
Joseph John Baluha
Defendant:
Mike Scott, Richard Scott, Officer Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marle v. Lee County Jail et al
as 2:2013cv00739
Plaintiff:
Katherine E. Marle
Defendant:
Lee County Jail, Jane Doe 1-10, John Doe 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler v. Scott
as 2:2013cv00732
Plaintiff:
Timothy Tyler
Defendant:
Mike Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holcomb v. Scott et al
as 2:2013cv00697
Plaintiff:
Robert Holcomb
Defendant:
Mike Scott, Thomas Ellegood, Thomas Eberhardt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler v. Scott et al
as 2:2013mc00045
Plaintiff:
Timothy Tyler
Defendant:
Mike Scott, C.O. Luma, C.O. Leavons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler v. Scott et al
as 2:2013cv00640
Plaintiff:
Timothy Tyler
Defendant:
Mike Scott, C.O. Luma, C.O. Leavons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
