Cases 51 - 60 of 66
Owens v. Armstrong et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2009cv00607
Plaintiff:
Frederick Owens
Defendant:
Lawton E. Armstrong, Clinton Law, Mark Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Reeves et al
as 2:2009cv01003
Plaintiff:
Anthony S. Brooks
Defendant:
Daniel Reeves, Chris Curry, Bobby Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Presley v. Joiner et al
as 2:2009cv00870
Petitioner:
Gary Wayne Presley
Respondent:
J Michael Joiner, G Daniel Reeves, Robert Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boglin v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2009cv00423
Plaintiff:
Vincent Earl Boglin
Defendant:
Gene Mitchell, Nina Shelton and Tim Owens
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robinson v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00945
Plaintiff:
Robert Junior Robinson
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Richard Allen, Levan Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Owens (INMATE 1)(CONSENT)
as 2:2008cv00852
Plaintiff:
Carl LaShane Smith
Defendant:
CO I Owens and CO I Owens
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Owens v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00770
Plaintiff:
Richard Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
J. C. Giles and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Owens v. Jones et al
as 2:2007cv01740
Petitioner:
Reginald A Owens
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones, Gregory King, Bollings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2007cv00777
Plaintiff:
Reginald A. Owens
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones, Gregory King, Officer Bollings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Jones et al
as 2:2007cv01436
Petitioner:
Reginald Owens
Respondent:
Kenneth Jones and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
