Cases 51 - 60 of 89
FLETCHER v. STINE et al
as 1:2010cv01602
Defendant:
CAPTAIN DEATON, JENNIFER FRENCH, CHUCK PENFOLD and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN FLETCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLETCHER v. STINE et al
as 1:2010cv01204
Defendant:
CAPTAIN DEATON, JENNIFER FRENCH, CHUCK PENFOLD and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN FLETCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. BUSS et al
as 1:2010cv01196
Respondent:
EDWIN G. BUSS, WENDY KNIGHT and C.A. PENFOLD
Petitioner:
CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURCHETT v. BUSS et al
as 1:2010cv01161
Petitioner:
PHILLIP D. BURCHETT
Respondent:
EDWIN BUSS, WENDY KNIGHT and C.A. PENFOLD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENSON v. BUSS et al
as 1:2010cv01009
Defendant:
RONDLE ANDERSON, CAPTAIN ROBERT BEAUTRY, JACK BINION and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY G. HENSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYTTON v. PENFOLD et al
as 1:2010cv00760
Defendant:
DAVID W. BARR, D. BRINKER, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK LYTTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILMORE v. PCF DHB et al
as 1:2010cv00682
Petitioner:
FREDDRICK GILMORE
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT, PCF DHB and C.A. PENFOLD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Hegwood v. Donald Stine, et al
as 10-1998
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. HEGWOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD STINE, EDWIN G. BUSS, PEPPI CHAPMAN and others
HEGWOOD v. STINE
as 1:2010cv00383
Defendant:
EDWIN BUSS, PEPPI CHAPMAN, C.A. PENFOLD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CORBALLY v. PENFOLD et al
as 1:2010cv00355
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER EDWIN BUSS, INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and CHUCK A. PENFOLD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
